MatPlus.Net

 Website founded by
Milan Velimirović
in 2006

9:49 UTC
ISC 2024
 
  Forum*
 
 
 
 

Username:

Password:

Remember me

 
Forgot your
password?
Click here!
SIGN IN
to create your account if you don't already have one.
CHESS
SOLVING

Tournaments
Rating lists
1-Oct-2024

B P C F





 
 
MatPlus.Net Forum General Check in n moves
 
You can only view this page!
(1) Posted by Hauke Reddmann [Monday, Sep 16, 2024 10:40]

Check in n moves


Do you know problems with stipulation "White gives a check in n moves"?
(Being mate at the same time may be allowed or not.)
Can Popeye/Olive handle that?
 
(Read Only)pid=26203
(2) Posted by Joost de Heer [Monday, Sep 16, 2024 11:43]

Yes, there are lots of examples. Both Popeye and Winchloe can solve this (Winchloe even has an option for double check).
Note that WinChloe defines a check as not mate.
See e.g. https://pdb.dieschwalbe.de/P1013874 which is cooked with Popeye but correct with WinChloe.

There are also some examples in BEISPIEL/stip.inp in the Popeye source code.
 
 
(Read Only)pid=26205
(3) Posted by Hauke Reddmann [Monday, Sep 16, 2024 17:43]

THX! The example screams for the question: Why not Rb3->b4 and drop the Circe?
But that surely resolves when read in context...
 
   
(Read Only)pid=26207
(4) Posted by Hauke Reddmann [Monday, Sep 16, 2024 18:06]

Aaaand here is an original by me (after I discovered replacing # with + in Olive
already does the trick).

You might or might not know that the starting position is a +5 (but cooked;
1.e3,e4,Sc3 and even Sa3 are good).

Of course I tried Chess 960 next. Even the stipuluation +2 works in some positions
(and mind you, as a correct problem). How many such positions exist?

EDIT: Can you find a correct (not dualistic or cooked) +3?
 
 
(Read Only)pid=26208

No more posts


MatPlus.Net Forum General Check in n moves