|(1) Posted by Steven Dowd [Tuesday, Jan 21, 2014 18:16]|
Which version would you prefer redux
If interested, take a look at:
Your comments there will be very helpful to me in that Diyan has told me I can decide later which of the two versions I enter as my final choice. Even if you aren't a selfmate composer, you probably have an opinion as to whether the "technical pawn" is a good or bad choice just based on the aesthetics of the two mates.
|(2) Posted by Sven Hendrik Lossin [Wednesday, Jan 22, 2014 12:41]|
To make it short: I am with Diyan in this specific case and think there is not a lot to add to his words.
|(3) Posted by Jacques Rotenberg [Wednesday, Jan 22, 2014 18:35]|
For me you made the good choice, and I don't hesitate.
The mate in the middle of the board is lovely, nothing to be compared with a mate alike on the edge
|(4) Posted by Sven Hendrik Lossin [Wednesday, Jan 22, 2014 20:21]|
Maybe it is more a question of expressing your own style in a composition than a matter of quality.
|(5) Posted by Steven Dowd [Thursday, Jan 23, 2014 01:17]|
Thanks to both of you. In addition to Jacques' comment about the more centralized mates, I'll note that 1. Sa5 as key, since it was more of a move to the edge of the board than 1. Sb5, provided a better contrast to the centralized mates in my view. The moves of the S to the center are also uniquely refuted, and thus you have a little paradox in that an edge knight move (Springer am Rande bringt... nun einmal nicht!) is superior to one to the middle of the board.
No more posts
MatPlus.Net Forum Selfmates Which version would you prefer redux