Website founded by
Milan Velimirović
in 2006
23:08 UTC
| |
MatPlus.Net  Forum Competitions 100 years of Slovak Chess Union C 29.6.2024 |
| |
|
|
|
|
You can only view this page!
| | | (1) Posted by Peter Gvozdjak [Saturday, Jan 13, 2024 12:13] | 100 years of Slovak Chess Union C 29.6.2024
Slovak Organization for Chess Composition (SOKŠ) in cooperation with Slovak Chess Union (SŠZ) announces international chess composition tourney 100 years of SŠZ in two sections:
For orthodox twomovers (#2) – judge Dragan Stojnić (Serbia), director Juraj Lörinc (juraj.lorinc@gmail.com).
For endgame studies – judge Péter Gyarmati (Hungary), director Ľuboš Kekely (kekely@zmail.sk).
Free theme in both sections. At most 3 compositions by one author per section (including joint compositions).
https://soks.sk/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/Sach_SK_100_vypisanie_final.pdf
| | | (2) Posted by Juraj Lörinc [Saturday, Jun 1, 2024 12:51] |
The last month before deadline. Good number (24) of #2 entries by 17 authors so far.
| | | (3) Posted by Juraj Lörinc [Friday, Oct 11, 2024 01:00] |
Both preliminary awards are now published:
#2 - https://soks.sk/predbezny-vysledok-jt-100-rokov-ssz-c-29-6-2024-2/
studies - https://soks.sk/predbezny-vysledok-jt-100-rokov-ssz-c-29-6-2024-studie/
They are open to claims till 11.11.2024.
| | | (4) Posted by Anatoly Slesarenko [Saturday, Oct 12, 2024 17:34] |
Great problem, Peter! Congratulations.
The problem of Marco Guida (3 prize) is totally anticipated by www.yacpdb.org/#490379
| | | (5) Posted by Dragan Stojnić [Saturday, Oct 12, 2024 23:05] |
Yes, similarity is unquestionable.
3rd Prize will be deleted from the award.
| | | (6) Posted by Marco Guida [Sunday, Oct 13, 2024 15:45] |
I agree that similarities in the matrix are definitely there; yet the system of effects I used to achieve the core Burmistrov combination is different and more subtle (interference of black lines vs. straight capture of black pawns). On the other hand, the predecessor adds a 3x2 Zagoruiko to the core Burmistrov combination, which is of course a plus. That said, as usual, no complaints at all whatever the decision of the judge is.
| | | (7) Posted by Jacques Rotenberg [Sunday, Oct 13, 2024 19:27] |
I can't resist the pleasure of showing here the "special Prize", once again Peter offers us a delightful historical achievement:
Peter Gvozdjak
special Prize
100 years of Slovak Chess Union tourney 2024
 (= 11+10 )
2#
1.Sf4? X [2.Qf3‡ A]
1…Q×f4 a 2.Sd5‡ B (Rc3?, Sc2?)
1…Qe5 b 2.Sc2‡ C (Rc3?)
(1…Qe4 2.Q×e4‡)
1…Sh2!
1.Se5? Y [2.Sd5‡ B]
1…Qf4 a 2.Sc2‡ C (Rc3?)
1…Q×e5 b 2.Qf3‡ A (Rc3?, Sc2?)
1…Qg4!
1.Rc3! [2.Sc2‡]
1…Qf4+ a 2.S×f4‡ X (Se5?)
1…Qe5+ b 2.S×e5‡ Y
Shedej-Lacny (named Dombro-Lacny in winchloe)
Zagoruiko 3x3 (in such a Zagoruiko 2x3 where all the threats are different it is in fact a 3x3 (you can for instance take 1...Ba3 as move "c")
anti-reversal paradox (x3 at least): 1.X x 2.Y# works but 1.Y x 2.X does not
super-focal queen who guards a mate on 3 different lines !
change in the defense motive 2x3 : each of the thematic moves 1...Qe5 and 1...Qf4 once controls the threat, once gives a flght, once gives a check
All in all the 8 white officers (K, Q, 2R, 2B, 2S) are involved in the matrix which is a super-rare feature
A problem extremely complex and nice which deserves a close analysis.
| | | (8) Posted by Joose Norri [Monday, Oct 14, 2024 03:41] |
Is the anti-Reversal really x3?
| | | (9) Posted by seetharaman kalyan [Monday, Oct 14, 2024 05:16] |
@ Jacques
A great problem indeed.
But why special prize?
| | | (10) Posted by shankar ram [Monday, Oct 14, 2024 06:01] |
Also Vladimirov/Banny theme:
1.Sf4? 1...Qe5/Qf4
1.Se5? 1...Qe5/Qf4
1.Rc3! 1...Qe5/Qf4 2.Sxe5/Sxf4
1.A? 1...x/y
1.B? 1...x/y
1.C! 1...x/y 2.A/B
| | | (11) Posted by Jacques Rotenberg [Monday, Oct 14, 2024 07:05] |
Why « Special Prize »?
Well, I was not the judge.
If I understand what the judge wrote, there are « duals » in the tries, if black defend with weaker moves than the thematic ones.
In a sense, you can see these « duals » as defects, but you can see them also as quality :
The only black moves to be considered are the thematic ones, and it adds clarity (only 1…Qe4 appears once as side variation in a try) the other black defenses are « weaker » as underlined by these « duals ».
In the actual play there are only the thematic defenses, and no dual at all.
So personally, I don’t mind.
About Vladimirov (Banny) : these themes are initially defined by refutations of tries and not by variations.
The Vladimirov is with anti reversal paradox, the Banny without :
Vladimirov :
1.X? x! 1.Y y! 1.Z! x/y 2.X#/Y#
Banny:
1.X? x! 1.Y y! 1.Z! x/y 2.Y#/X#
That’s why I prefer the term « anti-reversal paradox »
Why x3 ?
Twice 2.Rc3 is forbidden because the rook is pinned
Once because of a flight
and once because of the same flight and the same pin. This 4th I tend not to consider.
| | | (12) Posted by seetharaman kalyan [Monday, Oct 14, 2024 16:16] |
Thanks Jaques for detailed educative explanation
| | | (13) Posted by Joose Norri [Tuesday, Oct 15, 2024 10:26] |
As I see it, 1.Sf4? Qe5 2.Rc3?? and 1.Se5? Qf4 2.Rc3? are not part of anti-reversal, because the Black Q-moves are not the same x as after 1.Rc3!. So it looks x2 to me. Am I overlooking something?
| | | (14) Posted by Jacques Rotenberg [Tuesday, Oct 15, 2024 18:24] |
You are right Joose, my mistake.
nor 1.Rc3 Qf4 2.Se5 nor 1.Se5 Qf4 2.Rc3 occur
| | | (15) Posted by Joose Norri [Thursday, Oct 17, 2024 21:55] |
Here we are very close to coining an unusually beautiful terminus technicus : the pseudo anti reversal.
| | | (16) Posted by Jacques Rotenberg [Sunday, Oct 20, 2024 06:46] |
You have a proposal?
| | | (17) Posted by Joose Norri [Thursday, Oct 24, 2024 23:44] |
I suppose I made a failed attempt at sarcasm - a pseudo attempt?!
I guess my thoughts wandered in the general direction of chess book titles like John Nunn's Beating the Sicilian: what have the poor islanders done to deserve a beating, and isn't it against the law to publish a book of instruction on it? Likewise: what does the man on the street think of when he hears the term pseudo anti reversal.
| | | (18) Posted by Hauke Reddmann [Friday, Oct 25, 2024 09:35] |
I can quote an example from my club zine poking fun at technical terms that
sound like nonsense to the uninitiated (sorry, it's probably among the most early issues,
which I haven't OCRed yet, but it quotes from a moremover prize report, ending on
"In der Lösung dann schwarzer Holzhausen. Hervorragende Schnittpunktgeschichte.")
Even "worse" is that in Hamburg we have an OTB player named Holzhausen, making
Windows searching the files useless.
But that's the 1 million € question: should we care at all about the man on the street?
Here is what ChatGPT said, sounding a bit like another forum member :-) and being
a bit alarmist (problem chess is no heart chirurgy after all):
'The Language Barrier: Navigating Professional Jargon for Better Public Understanding
In the intricate tapestry of society, specialized professions often emerge with their own lexicon—an exclusive language laden with terminology that, while essential for practitioners, can seem like a foreign dialect to the uninitiated. This phenomenon raises an important question: should these professions be concerned about their language and make efforts to bridge the gap between themselves and the proverbial "man on the street"? The answer is a resounding yes, for the implications of effective communication stretch far beyond mere semantics; they touch upon education, public trust, and the relevance of specialized fields within a democratic society.
At the heart of the issue lies the nature of knowledge and its dissemination. Specialized professions, be it in medicine, law, finance, or technology, often deal with complex concepts that require a deep understanding, which contributes to the creation of jargon. While this specialized vocabulary can enhance precision among peers, it can also alienate the very populations that these professions serve. For instance, a medical professional using terms like "hypertension" or "tachycardia" without clear explanations may leave patients feeling confused and disengaged. Such a disconnect is not merely a matter of inconvenience; it can lead to serious consequences in areas like health decision-making and legal comprehension.
To counter this disconnect, it is imperative for professions to prioritize accessibility in their communication. Efforts can begin with education, both in professional training programs and ongoing professional development. Practitioners should be encouraged—or even required—to develop skills in public communication, translating their specialized knowledge into language that is understandable and relatable for the layperson. For example, a doctor might explain a diagnosis by using analogies or everyday terms that evoke familiarity rather than confusion. Workshops that focus on effective communication and public engagement can equip professionals with the tools they need not only to convey important information but also to foster trust and rapport with their communities.
Furthermore, professionals should actively seek to engage with the public through outreach initiatives, workshops, or community forums. These platforms not only humanize the professions but also provide safe spaces for dialogue and clarification. When practitioners share their expertise in an approachable manner, they demystify their fields, reducing barriers and ultimately leading to informed decision-making among the public.
Another component of this accessibility drive involves the responsible use of technology and media. In an age dominated by digital content, professionals have the opportunity to share knowledge through blogs, videos, and social media in a manner that is digestible and engaging. By utilizing storytelling techniques and visuals, complex information can be presented in ways that resonate with diverse audiences, ensuring that crucial insights reach those who need them most.
In conclusion, while the use of specialized terminology may be a natural evolution of any profession, it is essential to recognize the potential ramifications of alienating those outside the field. The responsibility to foster understanding and accessibility lies not solely with the public but also with the professionals themselves. By prioritizing clear communication, engaging with their communities, and embracing diverse platforms for outreach, specialized professions can not only enhance their relevance but also build a bridge of trust and understanding with the "man on the street." Ultimately, the goal is a society where knowledge is shared widely, empowering individuals and enriching the collective experience.'
Well, SCHWALBE started the Youtube channel "Mustermatt". It hasn't 100000000 followers, but it's a start.
| | | (19) Posted by Peter Gvozdjak [Monday, Oct 28, 2024 22:44] |
joose (15):
your sarcasm attempt has been partially anticipated - in winchloe you can find the following theme: Pseudo-anti-reversal cyclique.
now you can guess what such a theme is about...
| | | (20) Posted by Jacques Rotenberg [Wednesday, Oct 30, 2024 08:52] |
"Pseudo anti-reversal cyclique" could be (wrongly) translated "cyclic pseudo anti-reversal", but, in fact, due to the explicit scheme given as explanation it is anti-reversal pseudo-cyclic or pseudo-cyclic anti-reversal :
the anti-reversal is as usual, the cycle is "pseudo".
So, the anti-reversal is still waiting for its pseudo.
With sarcasm, or without : words (jargon) are a bit like chess pieces, when used and placed at their best, it is wonderful.
| |
No more posts |
MatPlus.Net Forum Competitions 100 years of Slovak Chess Union C 29.6.2024 |
|
|
|
ISC 2024
