13:23 CET
| |
MatPlus.Net  Magazine Errata Mat Plus Autumn 2007 |
| |
|
|
|
|
You can only view this page!
| | | (1) Posted by Siegfried Hornecker [Monday, Sep 24, 2007 23:10] | Mat Plus Autumn 2007
My study (Ka8/Kb6) should be win instead of draw. I was told there was made a mistake.
MPID is 538 (this is important for editorial team only, nobody else can access it this way)
| | | (2) Posted by Hans Gruber [Saturday, Dec 15, 2007 15:00]; edited by Hans Gruber [07-12-15] |
Dear retro friends,
one amendment concerning the retro definitions is necessary, as I was told by Bernd Gräfrath (Germany).
Page 56: Hoeg Retractor is - like Proca Retractor - a DEFENSIVE Retractor. If a un-capture is made, then the side of the captured piece decides which type of piece is uncaptured. (One could argue that this is even MORE defensive than the Proca type.)
hg hg
| | | (3) Posted by Siegfried Hornecker [Monday, May 26, 2008 00:59]; edited by Siegfried Hornecker [08-05-29] |
You can throw my twomover into the bin (PS, May 29 2008: sorry, of course you can't do so physically but you know what I want to say).
Nenad Petrovic
The Problemist, 1963
Mate in 2
This totally anticipates it and not only that, it shows the knight wheel by both knights. What a great masterpiece one only can appreciate when he tried himself to compose a knight wheel! Sure, there are "defects" that would make a normal problem unpublishable, but it's a great achievement.
PS: I found it in this very nice article. http://www.jlevitt.dircon.co.uk/task.htm
| |
No more posts |
MatPlus.Net Magazine Errata Mat Plus Autumn 2007 |
|
|
|
